|
Strategic Management Journal (2001-2002) - Thank you Eric Olson for creating
this file
- M. Song, R. J. Calatone, C. A. DiBenedetto (2002),
""Competitive Forces and Strategic Choice Decisions: An Experimental
Investigation in the United States and Japan," SMJ, 23 (Oct), 969-978.
High buyer power and high substitution threat enhance cost-leadership
strategy adoption. Under conditions of high buyer power U.S. managers
are less likely than Japanese managers to enter a market with a differentiation
or focus strategy.
- W. T. Robinson and J. Chiang (2002), "Product
Development Strategies for Established Market Pioneers, Early Followers,
and Late Entrants," SMJ, 23 (SepT), 855-866. Market pioneers and
early followers tend to emphasize minor improvements such as line extensions
and product improvement. Few late entrants engage in substantial new
product development activities, but those that do tend to emphasize
major development efforts.
- S. F. Slater and E. M. Olson "Marketing's Contribution
to the Implementation of Business Strategies: An Empirical Analysis,
" SMJ, 22 (Nov.) 2001 p. 1055-1067. Creation of an empirical typology
of marketing strategy of Aggressive Marketers, Mass Marketers, Marketing
Minimizers, Value Marketers. Marketing strategy types are matched with
competitive strategies at SBU level (Prospectors, Analyzers, Low Cost
Defenders, Differentiated Defenders) and impact on firm performance
is assessed.
- G. T. M. Hult and P. J. Ketchen, Jr. (2001), "Does
Market Orientation Matter? A Test of the Relationship Between Positional
Advantagae and Performance," SMJ, 22 (Sept), 899-906. Resource-based
view of the firm to suggest market orientation, entrepreneurship, innovativeness,
and organizational learning each contribute to the positional
advantage of some firms.
- S. F. Slater and E. M. Olson (2000), "Strategy
Type and Performance: The Influence of Sales Force Management,"
SMJ, 21 (Aug), 813-829. Sales management policies
and practices vary with the competitive strategy adopted by the firm
and influence firm performance.
- C. E. Helfat and R. S. Raubitshek (2000), "Product
Sequencing: Co-evolution of Knowledge Capabilities and Products,"
SMJ, 21 (Oct/Nov), 961-979. How the evolution of organizational knowledge
capabilities and products over long time spans can result in competitive
advantage.
- H. Lee, K. G. Smith, C. M. Grimm and A. Schomburg
(2000), "Timing, Order, and Durability of New Product Advantages
With Imitation," SMJ, 21 (Jan), 23-30. Impact on stock price of
the effects of timing, order, and durability of first mover advantages.
- O. Sorenson (2000), "Letting the Market Work For
You: An Evolutionary Perspective on Product Strategy," SMJ, 21
(May), 577-592.
|
